If Republicans Don’t Share Trump’s Racism, They Should Probably Let Us Know - DMT NEWS

Breaking News

If Republicans Don’t Share Trump’s Racism, They Should Probably Let Us Know

DMT.NEWS #music


It’s now been over 24 hours since President Trump to a group of congresswomen of color to “go back” to the “totally broken and crime infested places from which they came.” GOP lawmakers are still silent.

As Republicans and their staffs continue to sort out the calculus of whether it’s politically expedient to issue some sort of statement distancing themselves from the president’s racism, Trump has doubled and tripled down on his attacks. “So sad to see the Democrats sticking up for people who speak so badly of our Country,” he wrote Sunday night, presumably, again, in reference to how Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) have criticized the conditions of border facilities housing migrants. “Such disgraceful behavior,” he added.

On Monday morning, he tweeted that the congresswomen should “apologize” for their “foul language” and their “horrible & disgusting actions.” A few minutes later, he called them racist.

On Sunday, Maggie Haberman of the New York Times suggested that Trump’s decision to keeping running with the attacks was due in part to his party’s refusal to condemn them. “Subtext is no one in his party challenged him today so now he’s trying to make it a straight up/down referendum on this,” she wrote. Trump probably would have kept attacking the congresswomen anyway, but the GOP’s silence certainly isn’t helping. It also shows just how wholly the president’s white nationalism has subsumed the Republican Party. Trump’s values are their values, and Trump values an America that is white. This is no longer an issue of subtext.

It wasn’t that long ago that most Republicans would at least feign disgust whenever Trump would show his true colors.

During the 2016 campaign, when U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel presided over a fraud case involving Trump University, the president wrote that Curiel being “Mexican” presented a conflict of interest given Trump’s drive to construct a wall along the southern border (Curiel was born in Indiana). Several Republicans bashed the president’s allegation. Then-House Speaker Paul Ryan, lately a target of Trump’s Twitter attacks, called it “the textbook definition of a racist comment.”

Once Trump was elected, GOP objections to the president’s xenophobia were rarely so sharply worded. Instead, Republican lawmakers found the president’s comments “troubling,” their disappointment usually coming in the form of a boilerplate statement issued via tweet. The routine got old as it became clear they weren’t actually going to do anything about it. These ostensibly appalled Republicans still voted along with the president’s agenda and supported him when it mattered. If they didn’t, they subjected themselves to an attack from the president, presumably costing them the support of his base.

Coming up on two-and-a-half years into Trump’s presidency, Republicans have shed all pretense of caring that the leader of the free world is a virulent racist. Those who once made paltry efforts to keep Trump’s white nationalism at arm’s length have now embraced it as the public-facing identity of the GOP. The only substantial criticism of Trump’s racist tirade on Sunday came from Rep. Justin Amash, who announced earlier this month that he was leaving the party.

The only other conservative lawmaker to chime in has been Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), who was only able to manage that it was “wrong” for the president to tell American-born congresswomen who have brown skin to go back to their countries “from which they came.” It was a pathetically hedged criticism — the first word of the next sentence of Roy’s tweet was “but” — but at least it was a criticism.

Everyone else has stayed silent. They know that, politically, they stand to lose more than they stand to gain by bucking the president. They blame Democrats, but no longer dare to criticize Trump for his word and actions, no matter how vile. The most craven and shameless among them have even taken to parroting the president’s language regarding people of color. Speaking of the conditions of the facilities in which migrants are being detained at the border, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said on Sunday that he doesn’t “care if they have to stay in these facilities for 400 days.” A day later, he called the congresswomen attack by Trump “anti-America” in part of an extended screed that Trump quoted fawningly (adding a “Need I say more?”) in yet another string of tweets.

Just like Paul Ryan, Graham was a harsh critic of Trump during the 2016 campaign, calling him “completely unhinged,” among other similar attacks. Graham might now be the president’s most loyal sycophant in the Senate, a chamber filled former Trump opponents who as of Monday morning are too scared to criticize one of the most garishly un-American sentiments a president has ever expressed. That is to say, the ones who don’t agree with it.

As Rep. Ocasio-Cortez tweeted Monday morning, their silence is tantamount to an endorsement.

If this isn’t the Republicans’ agenda, some of them might want to go ahead and make that clear publicly.



Music

via https://www.DMT.NEWS

Ryan Bort, Khareem Sudlow